DIYMobileAudio.com Car Stereo Forum banner

help me make a better decision...

1.2K views 14 replies 5 participants last post by  ric  
#1 ·
hi guys, im planing on moving to a single sub install, coming from 2 10"s. its and SQ 3way front (full active )with and SQL type of sub right now, looking at a single 12" or 15" on a 1.5cube sealed box more or less.

im currently on an eye for a 12" ID Max v3, havent heard one yet but ive audition the IDQ, SQ is really good for me but at times or on some music, it lacks a bit, dont know if its on the sub itself or on the tuning done... but im also moved and tickled by the sound of a single FiQ, havoc or Sundown 15", but it time i feel the bass is too much, making at abit muddy etc. again dont know if its the sub itself or the tuning done..

ive read so many times that the ID max has similar traits on the IDQ, fast good transient response, snappy, good capabilities to blend with the midbass etc, but im afraid that it may have similar traits also that like the IDQ, that at time it may also sound dry on some music...

so question is, which would have better capabilities when all around music will be used or which would be a better route?

1. get the ID Max and get the best possible SQ on a capable loud sub then tune it to have the "weight" of bass that the FiQ, Havoc or SundownZ have

or

2. get a FiQ, Havoc or SundownZ sub and just tune it to be like the IDmax, fast, blends well with the midbass good transience etc. since the weight is already there...

im also considering the the fact that getting a FiQ, Havoc or SundownZ would also not be good only in the sense that i may not be using it even to its full potential for i guess it may be too loud for me already, hence eying for the IDmax... but im eying on them because they are really capable subs when needed to and im also afraid of some reviews where the IDmax dosent perform well on 1k watts, hence may not be as durable as it may seem? and i like their sound just not as good SQ wise as the ID max does, the the weight of bass those 3 can deliver, it really tickles me... :laugh:


thanks for any inputs guys...

amp BTW is a 1000/1
 
#2 ·
Ok it sounds like you have done a good bit of searching so far, have you got a modelling program to simulate woofers in boxers to aid you in your decision?

You seem to have an advantage over some people on the forum as you have actually heard the subs you are interested in, which is way better than buying one and hoping for the best!

With 1000w on tap, I'd be leaning you towards a sub from Exodus Audio, either a 12" Shiva X2 or a 15" Tempest. I haven't heard either but I have heard other XBL^2 enabled woofers and they are capable of high excursion and low distortion and are just great performers, as far as I've heard..

While you were auditioning those subs, with regards to the muddiness of the sound etc, did you listen to them in their optimum enclosures?? This can make a LARGE difference to how a sub (or any speaker) can sound.
 
#3 ·
thanks for the reply, as far as the enclosure, yes im sure they are for the ones ive listened were cars that join comps... the sundown even on an full active 4way SQ competition car... that the midbass was crossed very low, then the sub to really cover all bottom octaves it think to about 15hz or below, forgot the reading they had before on it. hahaha...

i dont have any modeling program though but my friends have it...

so for you personally, the shivas would be a better option? prob that i have with it is i wont have the support i need for im out of the US...
 
#4 ·
Well personally (seeing as speaker selection is quite a personal preference thing) I am going to buy a Shiva for my car sub soon. They have the XBL^2 motor which I have heard in a 8" midbass/sub and enjoyed a lot, although I know that not everyone loves that kind of motor design.

My brother has an IDMAX and while it is a solid hard hitting, loud sub that can get pretty low for an out of the box sealed setup, it left a little to be desired for me, with a lack of any shorting rings and I think when modelled actually need a huge box for a QTC of 0.707, but are recommended for a much smaller one as per the instructions.
The IDMAX seems to have a bit of trouble blending as much compared to some other subs, but that could easily be my brothers' install more than anything, not sure..

Out of your choices, I would probably go with the Fi Q, having never heard it though is a disadvantage, but it seems like a great SQ choice with good output.

I can't vouch for the Sundown as I've never really had anything to do with them, although I'm sure someone else would be able to give you an idea of how that would compare to the others you have listed.
 
#5 ·
I dunno if anybody is going to be able to tell you anything you don't already know.

Sounds like you have a good idea of what you want, but haven't quite heard it for yourself yet. Given your comments so far and the amp you have to run it, maybe a 12" FiQ instead of a 15" would be the right choice for you, but you're probably better off to keep auditioning whatever options you can listen to until you hear the right thing.
 
#6 ·
Thanks guys...

@ tornaido_3927 - yup thats the thing im a little concerned about, maybe due to the dryness the ID's have, it may be accurate but not as fun as the others, it may left me wanting something more still...

@ Chaos - thanks, well this is more of a question of which tuning would be more applicable as stated above rather than which sub is better... thats where im really confused... hehehe... and yup, i might go with 12"s rather 15"s... unless i check out the 15" GTi... hahaha....
 
#9 ·
ID, Fi, Sundown all make generic subwoofers with parabolic BL curves that produce nonlinear distortion. While some people like it, I cannot recommend these brands for SQ.

If you want SQ, you should look at stuff more like Exodus Audio, Acoustic Elegance, Creative Sound Solutions, TC Sounds LMS, Stereo Integrity, Dayton Reference Series, etc. These are all low distortion subwoofers with excellent sound quality.

I do not know much about Ascendant Audio these days but I know that in the past, when Chad ran it, they had their own technology that competed with XBL^2 to linearize the BL curve. If they still use that technology (or if they use XBL^2), then they are probably also good for sound quality.
 
#11 ·
I would go with one of the options that I listed, personally. Actually, that's what I intend to do, myself - an Exodus Audio Shiva-X2. It has better SQ than most subwoofers, and will sound good, but it may not quite be up to some of the expensive Focal/ScanSpeak/etc. subwoofers - though it'll displace as much as 3-4 of those...
 
#13 ·
thanks for the inputs guys, im just abit hesitant on the brands you mentioned for im not in the US, it might be high for me as for the tax duties ill be paying to have it shipped hit, plus, CS would not be at par as compared to somebody in the US...

as much as i can, i would like to get something available here...

BTW: would a JBL GTImkII be part of your list of " low distortion subwoofers with excellent sound quality."?