Ok, so I'm trying to decide on which to use in my upcoming 3-way front stage.
Power will more than likely be off a JL 300/4. I'm planning to install whichever speaker in pillar pods close to the tweeter as possible, since the mid and tweet will be run off the tweet pre-out on my deck, t/a will affect both. Peerless will remain installed in my doors as dedicated midbass. Then the mid will start somewhere around 500-1000hz, I'll have to test that out and see what works. I'll lp the mid probably somewhere around 4-5khz and have the Neo3 pick up from there.
RS100
Pros: Price. Plays lower and possibly higher w/o breakup.
Cons: Needs an enclosure.
RS52
Pros: No enclosure necessary
Cons: size, but this could probably be fixed by trimming down the mounting flange.
Does anyone on here have anything else to add either way for these drivers? I plan to start the build in a few weeks but I'm still trying to source a 300/4.
Thanks,
Patrick
Power will more than likely be off a JL 300/4. I'm planning to install whichever speaker in pillar pods close to the tweeter as possible, since the mid and tweet will be run off the tweet pre-out on my deck, t/a will affect both. Peerless will remain installed in my doors as dedicated midbass. Then the mid will start somewhere around 500-1000hz, I'll have to test that out and see what works. I'll lp the mid probably somewhere around 4-5khz and have the Neo3 pick up from there.
RS100
Pros: Price. Plays lower and possibly higher w/o breakup.
Cons: Needs an enclosure.
RS52
Pros: No enclosure necessary
Cons: size, but this could probably be fixed by trimming down the mounting flange.
Does anyone on here have anything else to add either way for these drivers? I plan to start the build in a few weeks but I'm still trying to source a 300/4.
Thanks,
Patrick